I did realize people would equate the idea of "strong disbelief" to a belief, and I addressed that a little in the piece. I'm assuming you didn't read all the way through. In any case, the lack of belief in something in no way equates to the belief in something. You are using Appeal to Ignorance fallacy, saying "If you can't prove me wrong, than I am right". In this case you are stating that, if X is faith, -X = +X and this isn't correct.